Transforming Banks – IT Challenges for Structural Productivity Gains

Transforming Banks – IT Challenges for Structural Productivity Gains

The Chief Information Officers of the banks are under extreme pressure. While the banks have to manage with insufficient returns on equity, their cost-cutting stress and IT demands are increasing. So, CIOs must explore the possibilities of controlling costs through productivity gains to accommodate budgets for investments in tech-enabled changes and generate business for the banks.

Banks have to counterbalance the increase in IT costs with productivity gains. According to the McKinsey Digital 20/20 survey of global banks, it is evident that IT costs have increased exponentially from 16.5% in 2014 to 18.5% in 2017. The run spend has almost remained flat while the change spend has increased by 40% in the same period.

It’s an alarming phase for CIOs to improve the productivity efforts in banks. Aim for 25-40% of structural productivity gains in the coming five years to keep costs flat.

The CIOs have ample opportunities to strengthen the banks’ productivity gains. McKinsey claims the experience working with banks in recent years suggests the full set of levers has led to 25-40% in productivity gains.

Prompt payback levers

1. Reduction of demand

If the banks can review their IT expenditures periodically, they can lower IT demands significantly. It can provide 5-10% IT savings in less than a year. For example: focus on the projects which are directly linked to the bank’s strategic goals, plan to shift the workloads away from peak times, prioritize the value-add service to match actual demand, purging historical data, and so on.

2. Optimizing vendors

Vendor optimization actions can provide 5-10% savings to the banks in a year. Reduce outsourcing costs by working directly with the vendors, introducing alternative pricing models to vendors, consolidating the relationships, etc.

3. Labour optimization

The best way to distribute responsibilities is by mixing the labour models. Strategically allocate the work to balance costs with controllability, agility, and responsiveness through insourcing, strategic partnerships, outsourcing, and offshoring methods. Many banks and organizations prefer restricting the usage of temporary labour or hiring only if there is an inadequate workforce for a particular role, which can save 20% of temporary labour costs.

Long-term structural levers

1. Transitioning to public cloud

Compared to traditional hosting, migrating to the public cloud can save up to 30-40% of the workload costs. Banks can mainly preserve 90% of labour costs with better management and reduce non-labour charges such as hosting and networking assets. Cloud transitioning also enables the other transformation levers, like infrastructure automation.

2. Infrastructure automation and DevOps at scale

With infrastructure automation and DevOps, 30-35% of activities can be automated across the IT chain like provisioning, testing, deployment, patching, and support. A European bank has reduced its IT infrastructure team by 45% in less than 9-months by implementing the automation and reducing manual intervention at any stage.

3. Agile

Agile enables CIOs to bring ideas to market and speeds up the release of functionality quarterly from monthly or several weeks. It improves maintenance and application development efficiency by 20-30%, which banks can consider as savings or freed up capacity.

4. Nurturing talents

India has an abundance of talented and experienced software engineers. But, in view of lowering costs, many organizations offshore the work to novices, resulting in lower productivity. Many banks have insourcing roles for experienced engineers, This provides a competitive advantage and improves productivity.

5. Systemizing the applications

If banks implement the simplification program by modernizing their application landscapes, they can reduce applications by 30-40% and save the application ownership costs by 15-20% per year.

6. Mainframe, end-user computing, and network optimization

Banks can lower their run costs by optimizing core infrastructure components that enable the other transformation levers. Usage of shared mainframe environment lowers 20-30% of costs. Helpdesk and end-user computing costs can be reduced through systematic root-cause analysis of common issues, and it saves up to 20-30% costs. Network costs can be reduced through software-defined networking that responds to demand fluctuations rather than provisioning fixed capacity.

Conclusion

Digital transformation keeps changing the banking landscape and appears to be putting pressure on the traditional banking system. However, growth is becoming gloomy for banks as the global economy is declining. Hence, it is crucial for banks to build efficient IT delivery models to flourish in this environment.